Obamafs Jobs Plan Is Blocked Again by Senate Republicans
Published: October 20, 2011 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — For the second time in 10 days, the Senate on Thursday rejected
Democratic efforts to take up a jobs bill championed by President
Obama.
The vote to advance the bill was 50
to 50. Democrats needed 60 votes to overcome a Republican filibuster.
This time, the
bill was narrowed to provide $35 billion to state and local governments to
prevent layoffs of teachers, police officers and firefighters. To offset the
cost, the bill would impose a surtax of 0.5 percent, starting in 2013, on income
in excess of $1 million.
Despite the vote Thursday, Democrats said they hoped to gain a political
edge, by forcing Republicans to vote on this and other discrete parts of broader
legislation proposed by Mr. Obama to create jobs and revive the economy.
Campaigning for his $447 billion jobs package this week in North Carolina and
Virginia, Mr. Obama suggested that Republicans could not understand the whole
thing all at once, so he said gwefre going to chop it up into some bite-sized
pieces.h
The Senate last week blocked
consideration of the larger bill, which included a 5.6 percent surtax on
income over $1 million.
Republicans objected to the tax and said the bill would be no more successful
than the economic stimulus law Mr. Obama signed in February 2009.
The vote late Thursday generally followed party lines. Two Democrats —
Senators Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Mark Pryor of Arkansas — and Senator Joseph
I. Lieberman, independent of Connecticut, joined Republicans in voting against
immediate consideration of the bill for public employees.
Both parties seized on the smaller bill to draw contrasts in advance of the
2012 elections.
Democrats said the bill would save or create jobs for nearly 400,000 teachers
and force millionaires to make a small sacrifice for the benefit of the nation.
gThe massive layoffs we have had in America today are rooted in the last
administration,h said the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of
Nevada. gIt is very clear that private sector jobs have been doing fine. It is
the public sector jobs where we have lost huge numbers.h
The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, derided the
Democratsf proposal as ga government jobs bill.h He said it would gimpose a
permanent tax hike on about 300,000 U.S. business owners and then use the money
to bail out cities and states that cannot pay their bills.h
The bill would pay for the hiring, rehiring and retention of school
employees, law enforcement officers, firefighters and other emergency workers.
Public employees and labor union leaders joined Democrats, including Vice
President Joseph R. Biden Jr., at a rally on Wednesday urging the Senate to pass
the bill. Mr. Biden said that because of police layoffs, gmurder rates are up,
robberies are up, rapes are uph in many cities.
Democrats see an urgent need to aid state and local governments, whose
revenues have not fully recovered from the recession.
The Congressional Budget Office said that less than one-third of new spending
under the bill would occur in the coming year, however. It foresees annual
spending of roughly $11 billion in 2012 and 2013, followed by $7 billion in
2014, $5 billion in 2015 and $1 billion in 2016.
Unable to pass the full bill devised by the White House, Senate Democrats
hope some of the individual pieces will prove more popular with Republicans.
Other smaller bills to be taken up in turn would expand the current payroll tax
cut for employees, increase spending on transportation and public works
projects, and provide incentives for the hiring of unemployed veterans.
For their part, Senate Republicans pushed Thursday for a bill that would
repeal a tax compliance requirement that businesses consider extremely
burdensome. The provision, adopted in 2006, requires federal, state and local
government agencies to deduct and withhold 3 percent of payments they make to
many suppliers of goods and services. The requirement was adopted after federal
auditors found that thousands of government contractors had substantial amounts
of unpaid federal taxes.
Democrats supported the intent of the bill, but blocked its consideration
because it would also require unspecified cuts in spending for domestic
programs.
Senator Scott P. Brown, Republican of Massachusetts, said, gWe need to repeal
once and for all this onerous and costly unfunded mandate.h
Republicans described their proposal as a jobs bill because, as Mr. Brown
said, it would grepeal a part of our tax code that promises to kill jobs.h
Enforcement of the requirement has been delayed several times. As part of his
jobs bill, Mr. Obama proposed a further delay, to 2014. Businesses say the
withholding will disrupt their cash flow and cause administrative headaches.